1400 Years of Islamic-Muslim Plunder and Brutality Against India

Video Description:

India is the birth place of the oldest & still living religion & culture in the world - Hinduism. Hindu religious scriptures date back up to 10,000 years. Buddhism & Sikhism were also born in India, Buddhism is over 2,500 years old and Sikhism is over 500 years old. These 3 religions are peaceful religions, they believe their is more than one path to God. Buddhists don't deal with the concept of God, but share the same views with Hindus and Sikhs(laws of Karma and trying to break the continuous cycle of life and death, reincarnation). In other words they respect & acknowledge other faiths. Hinduism, Buddhism & Sikhism are not one dimensional religious ideologies like Islam. Muslims have for centuries to present day tried & are trying to take over the world, with their religious ideology. They are still trying to wipe out other religions around the world. They only want their religion to rain supreme. Islam, therefore Muslims do not respect & acknowledge other faiths.

"Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued." Quran 9:29

"Have no unbelieving friends. Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them" Quran 4:89

"Fight them and Allah will punish them by your hands, lay them low, and cover them with shame. He will help you over them" Quran 9:14

"Slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them" Quran 9:5

"Fight the unbelievers around you, and let them find harshness in you" Quran 9:123

"O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people." Quran 5:51

"I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them." Quran 8:12

"Muslims that make friends with disbelievers will face a doom prepared for them by Allah." Quran 5:80

"Don't let the disbelievers think they can escape. They are your enemy and the enemy of Allah." Quran 8:59-60

"Fight the disbelievers and hypocrites. Be harsh with them. They are all going to hell anyway." Quran 9:73

"Scourge adulterers and adulteresses with 100 stripes. Do not show them any pity. Have a party of believers watch the punishment." Quran 24:2

"As to the thief, Male or female, cut off his or her hands: a punishment by way of example, from Allah, for their crime: and Allah is Exalted in power." Quran 5:38

"Those with Muhammad are ruthless toward disbelievers and merciful toward themselves." Quran 48:29

"Fight them until all opposition ends and all submit to Allah" Quran 8:39

http://www.prophetofdoom.net

http://www.muhammadtube.com/

http://www.faithfreedom.org

http://www.truthtube.tv

http://www.jihadwatch.org

http://www.investigateislam.com/

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com

Dr. Laina Farhat-Holzman: If Western Imperialism is to Blame, What about Thailand, Indonesia, Nigeria ... ?

Dr. Laina Farhat-Holzman is a historian, lecturer, and author of How Do You Know That?

From FSM:

There are two ways to analyze the violent eruption of global terrorist attacks that have marked the past three decades: analyze the nature of the threat and the culture supporting it, or blame it all on the evils of Western colonialism and American militarism. The latter analysis is the choice of the "politically correct," who say that terrorism is as rampant in the West as it is in the Muslim world. A truth check, however, will tell us that for every Western terrorist (such as Timothy McVeigh), there are hundreds almost exclusively from the Muslim world.

If colonialism is the villain of this piece, why do ideologues only talk about Western colonialism? Why ignore that Arab Muslims (and European Christians) suffered under 500 years of Ottoman Turkish colonialism well before Western colonization? And how about the Muslim world in Central Asia that suffered under both Russian Tsarist and Communist colonialism?

Arabs themselves were dreadful imperialists (700-1,000 A.D.) and every land they conquered is still dysfunctional today, according to Harvard economics professor, Eric Chaney: "Democratic Change in the Arab World, Past and Present," in the April 7 Economist and Fareed Zakaria in Time, April 7. Wherever Arabs conquered, good governance and economic development were smothered, as they are today. This is even true for countries temporarily conquered but not converted to Islam by the Arabs (Spain, Portugal, Southern Italy).

Islamist terrorism is not just aimed at the West (revenge for colonization), but also at Thailand (Buddhist); Muslim Indonesia, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Saudi Arabia; and Nigeria, where jihadis murdered Christian church goers on Easter Sunday. Black slavery was an Arab business long before it was European.

American deniers and apologists for Islamist terrorism have a colleague in Canada: Mira Blinkers, president of "Canadians-are-Under-No-Threat," who has passionately denounced the treatment of "captive insurgents" (her term for terrorists) and thinks that they should not only be treated better, but should be integrated into Canadian society. The current object of her attention is Afghan jihadi, Ahmed Allah-Akbar.

The satirical website, British Freedom, has offered an imaginary letter from Canada's Department of Defence, providing Ms. Blinker with a new "Adopt-a-Jihadist" program designed specifically for her. (See britishfreedom.org/canada's-new-adopt-a-jihadist-program/)

"In accordance with the guidelines of this new pilot program, we have decided to release one terrorist and place him in your custody. I am pleased to inform you that your personal detainee has been selected and is scheduled for transportation under heavily armed guard from Pearson International to your residence in Toronto next Thursday.

Ahmed Allah-Akbar (you can just call him Ahmed) is to be cared for pursuant to the standards you personally demanded in your letter of complaint. In other words, the standards which you and most people of your ideological persuasion demand of civilized democracies like Israel, but not of Islamic dictatorships.

We understand that you plan to offer counseling and home-schooling. Be warned. Your adopted terrorist is extremely proficient in hand-to-hand combat and can extinguish human life with such simple items as a pencil or nail clippers. We advise that you do not ask him to demonstrate these skills at your yoga class or while you are piloting your Cessna aircraft. He is also expert at making a wide variety of explosive devices from common household products, so you may wish to keep those items locked up, unless you think that this might offend him. [Canada permits ruinous lawsuits against those who "offend" Islamists.]

You will appreciate that Ahmed, as an Islamic fundamentalist, views females as a subhuman property without rights, including the right to refuse his sexual demands. This is a particularly sensitive subject for him and he has been known to show violent tendencies around women who fail to comply with the new dress code that he will "recommend" as more appropriate attire. I'm sure that, over time, you will come to enjoy the anonymity offered by the burka. Just remember that it is all part of 'respecting his culture and religious beliefs' as described in your letter."

The letter was signed by "General I. M. Perturbed." A man after my own heart.

MuslimWiki, NarSakSasLee and Jagged 85: The Insanity behind Pro-Islamic Propaganda

Have you ever heard complaints about Wikipedia's pro-Islam bias? If you're reading this, then the chances are you have. Many people have commented on this problem at Wikipedia (e.g. here, here, here, here and here).

Now try imagining how ridiculous a Muslim user's edits would have to be before Wikipedia finally decided to take action against them by deleting all of their contributions to the site. Too hard to imagine? Well, fear not, MuslimWiki, that bastion of neutrality, with the help of its genocidal and racist editors, is about to remind us.

Jagged 85

The now infamous Wikipedia user Jagged 85 was a Muslim editor who contributed to 8,115 separate Wikipedia articles with over 67,000 edits until being caught in 2010. Focusing efforts on improving the image of Islam and downplaying the achievements of the Western world (particularly in regards to the history of science, technology, and the so-called Islamic "Golden Age"), for 5 years he/she was left largely unhindered, misrepresenting sources in all kinds of ways, misrepresentations which were then reproduced all over the net by other sites which use Wikipedia as a source.

He was the main contributor to the many inaccurate Islam/Science/Golden Age articles which are still being copied and pasted all over the Internet by Muslims, and more than 20% of Wikipedia's "Timeline of historic inventions" was provided by him. Some of the problems identified by Wikipedia users included:

• Misrepresenting a source by quoting material utterly out of context 
• Reporting that a source supports a claim that it simply does not and sometimes explicitly does not
• Claiming that a certain figure invented something or was the first to do something, when the cited source simply says that they made or did that thing, without any suggestion that they were the first to do so
• Taking a passing comment about some connection to a modern theory and claiming that the Islamic thinker being discussed invented that theory or is an important forefather of that theory
• Reporting only one point from a source, even if a minor one, and ignoring the contrary position it reports, even if that is the majority position
• Rather than withdraw a claim, if it is pointed out that the cited source does not support the claim, finding a source of any quality to use instead, even when that may be of much lower quality than the original source, which made the opposite claim
• Inventing claims and citing sources connected with the issue but which simply do not support those claims
• Using questionable, inappropriate and unreliable sources
• Using exceptionally poor sources for exceptional claims

NarSakSasLee

Long time "Japanese" Wikipedia user NarSakSasLee a.k.a. IslamicWarrior has recently created a new user account for himself. More accurately, he's created several, but we shall be focusing on just the one, i.e. ChainedButFree. It is obviously him; if you look at his user sandbox, you will notice him working on the "Islam in Japan" article which was eventually imported to MuslimWiki under his IslamicWarrior user account.

He has recently got in contact with his apparent role-model Jagged 85 in order to recruit him for work at MuslimWiki. Jagged 85 gracefully declined but, after accusing Wikipedia of "racism", kindly offered him access to all of his deleted edits. ChainedButFree graciously accepted, assuring Jagged 85 that his "work wasn't in vain".

If you read some of ChainedButFree's comments, you'll be shocked at the hypocrisy, overt racism, hope for genocide against "whites" and paranoia they display:

Obviously I can't go up against systematic racists and racism (I have a hunch that that committee, at least one of the members belonged to that WikiIslam website that just paints Muslims so horribly and badly otherwise it wouldn't even be there). I can't stand racism Whites really need to sort out this ugly trait they have between themselves. I mean with parts of the Muslim world rising economically and former enslaved colonies getting much stronger (China, India, Malaysia and Indonesia) it won't be long before Whites are made the scapegoats. And who will care? No one that's for sure. They're just Whites. And its just racism at the end of the day. I mean they do have a long history of it. And yeah, join the project. That's what I'm going to be doing soon. I'll see you there. Until then take care.

Belonging to an ethnic minority myself, I'm acutely aware of how wide-spread racism still is among whites. But I'm not filled with the irrationality and hate displayed by NarSakSasLee, which would enable me to ignore the fact that racism is not unique to people who are "white". Try being part of an ethnic household living in a multicultural society. You will soon realize that racism is more prevalent among us than it is with the whites.

Ironically, Islam is the worst offender when it comes to religiously motivated racism and slavery,  and, what is the historical Muslim Conquests and modern-day jihad in order to implement Shari'ah, if not Islamic Imperialism?

Update

Jagged 85 is now officially a member of the MuslimWiki team of fiction writers. Already he is hard at work importing his deleted Wikipedia stories, for example, his fictional account of the "Islamic Golden Age", "Islamic Contributions to Physics", and how he wished "Islamic Law" contributed to Western Law. IslamicWarrior has also imported a lot of Jagged 85's fictional work that was rejected by Wikipedia, including "Islamic Contributions to Science",  "Islamic Contributions to Medicine",  "Islamic Contributions to Surgery", and   "Islamic Contributions to Pharmacy".